Usually, we are told all about “national security”, or “defense of democracy”, or stopping some crazed irrational power-hungry dictator. That point addresses why the wars are being fought in the first place. However, the main thrust of this article is a point that rarely makes it into the media or is mentioned by either of the “mainstream” parties. ![]() It is also obvious that military contractors are the recipients of tens of billions of dollars in government contracts (i.e., our tax dollars) that could otherwise be used for many useful projects, including environmental protection, cleanup, and transitioning to clean energy, all while creating living-wage jobs. According to a 2019 study at Boston and Brown Universities 1, “the DOD is the world’s largest institutional user of petroleum and correspondingly, the single largest institutional producer of greenhouse gases (GHG) in the world.” It is obvious that military action (and preparation for action) itself consumes a huge amount of energy and produces a huge amount of greenhouse gas emissions. Fighting around nuclear power plants – an especially stupid thing to do – may well lead to catastrophic toxic radioactive waste release spread over huge swaths of land. Escalation to nuclear use would be a worldwide humanitarian and ecological disaster. It is particularly pressing now because of the war in Ukraine.Įveryone knows that wars are hugely destructive to both people and the environment that is indeed the tactical intent of every exploding bomb and lethal projectile. “stay in its own lane”? More generally, should pro-environmental groups also be anti-war? The US government has been involved with fighting or funding wars for much of the past 80 years, so the question for us, as Americans, is not new. get involved in issues of international war? Or conversely, should W.A.T.E.R. Should an environment-protecting group like W.A.T.E.R.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |